Well that did happen to a buddy of mine at a computer firm.
One thing I can't stand is how most pro-male sites tend to be associated with the political and religious right, it's a huge turnoff.
I don't like these 'tradtional family' types and I don't like these advance women rights only feminists.
Saying that women get paid less than men for equal work is like saying that Blacks get paid less than Whites for equal work.
nah, you are horrible.
You're horrible. I can't reconcile what you're saying with all the great women I know.
No, you love the fact that people are retards. It gives you faith that women are evil.
Most of the people in hell will be women. You know why? Because they already made life on Earth hell for us. Therefor to balance things out (FAIRNESS as you said), women must go through hell.
BLS
bureau of labor statistics ....
I love that this comment is thumbed down. It gives me faith that the people here are not people who hate women and want power, but people who want fairness for all.
:)
Where did you get that stat? Because I think it's more!
job(outline/duties)= specific amount of pay
job + productivity + recognition= higher pay
job + time-off + being less productive= less pay or replacement
jobs consist of salary, commission, and hourly types, there are hybrid types that are made up of a combination of those. The wage gap doesn't address what type of jobs those are that women are getting paid less than men are.
Equal work is equally dangerous!
92.3% of all workplace deaths are MEN!
If women did work equal to men, they would be injured, disabled, maimed and killed at work in equal numbers, but they don't and thus they are just haters or morons who claim the pay disparity is oppression
I think you missed his point entirely.
He's right "If men lived balanced lives, then the general standard of living would be way down".
This is very true. The way the economy keeps growing is by teaching men to chase pyssy, and teaching men they need to buy pyssy to get her. Then wast money on alimony.
Therefore men spend all their time working themselves to death, making the country richer, and economy stronger.
If men only worked how much they need, the standard of living would go down.
perhaps i was wrong, in the western world (mainly america and europe) its vast majority how i described (with some exceptions like jamaica)
in the east its vast majority how you just described (with the cities being how i described and the 'country' areas being how you described)
cause the simple fact is people in the country are healthier and live longer than people in the city and this has been proven all over the world with different countries
I'm at the bottom end of that upper 5% and to be fair, I'm sort of seeing your point.
Then I'm reminded of my frequent overseas buying trips to China / Indonesia / Vietnam were I find the poorest (yet most balanced) people on the planet.
I think its perspective, were probably both from entirely different backgrounds and see things totally different.
Excellent video Karl!
i dont need to speak for myself, basic logic and real world facts speak for everyone including you weather you like it or not. the average person (95% of the world population of men) cant have a balanced life only the 5% (the basic rich right up to the elites) can cause they have the power and more importantly the money to be able to work less (if at all) and focus more on other aspect of there life instead of being preoccupied with survival 24/7
ps thats the truth weather u believe it or not
Then its solved - you can't live a balanced life.
Speak for yourself brother.
you might want to take a look at the writing above that quote before you start bitching about 'evidence says...'
that being this 'the reason men cant lead balanced lives cause they are obligated to provide no matter how long they have to work, hard they have to work, etc'
thats the reason we cant live 'balanced lives' the money to boost standard of living comes from us being unbalanced (WORK WORK WORK and little if anything else) and logic and life says im right
Lets simplify: When comparing same jobs for men & women - government statistics show less than 1% pay difference.
"if men where 'intelligent enough to lead balanced lives' then the general standard of living would be WAY DOWN"
- Evidence says you're wrong. Single mother homes breed 90% of our inmates; children from single father homes turn out as good as those from stable 2 parent homes.
Oh it continues on big time. Womens groups are in Business to sell panic stories for next years funding.
They lobby for tougher laws & expanded legal definitions to create more conflict. Why? So they can sell their bullshit story for more funding.
(Eg, rape is now classed as fully clothed innapropriate touching; Domestic violence is now non-physical stomping ones foot on the ground & shouting.)
Its all about money & dividing us while the elites assrape our money & future labor.
And even then it may still require additonal work. Because consider the fact that more men are working in a particular feild then that pool will automatically be larger than the other pool. So mathematcians would have to use some kind of relative adjuster, you could not compare absolute pool value in this case.
If what you said is true then that is an in accurate method of comparing wages. You can't pool all men's money and all woman's money then declare a difference. You have to compare job to job. So make seperate pools for every different job in the world then compare pools of the same job. Because since different jobs pay different monies if a man working as CEO is compared to a woman working as cashier thats not accurate and vice versa. Multiple pools must be done to make it accurate.
It is elaborated - 78.5 cents earned per 1 dollar a man earns comparing the entire job pool of women (starting at 35 hours a week) to men (working 60 hours a week.)
The entire concept of wage gap is a scam / comparing apples to oranges. Discriminating ANYONE by paying less for the same work has been illegal for decades.
7:36 dont like that last part. whats he trying to say men arnt intelligent
the reason men cant lead balanced lives cause they are obligated to provide no matter how long they have to work, hard they have to work, etc.
if men where 'intelligent enough to lead balanced lives' then the general standard of living would be WAY DOWN
コメント
Well that did happen to a buddy of mine at a computer firm.
One thing I can't stand is how most pro-male sites tend to be associated with the political and religious right, it's a huge turnoff. I don't like these 'tradtional family' types and I don't like these advance women rights only feminists.
Saying that women get paid less than men for equal work is like saying that Blacks get paid less than Whites for equal work.
nah, you are horrible.
You're horrible. I can't reconcile what you're saying with all the great women I know.
No, you love the fact that people are retards. It gives you faith that women are evil. Most of the people in hell will be women. You know why? Because they already made life on Earth hell for us. Therefor to balance things out (FAIRNESS as you said), women must go through hell.
BLS bureau of labor statistics ....
I love that this comment is thumbed down. It gives me faith that the people here are not people who hate women and want power, but people who want fairness for all. :)
Where did you get that stat? Because I think it's more!
job(outline/duties)= specific amount of pay job + productivity + recognition= higher pay job + time-off + being less productive= less pay or replacement jobs consist of salary, commission, and hourly types, there are hybrid types that are made up of a combination of those. The wage gap doesn't address what type of jobs those are that women are getting paid less than men are.
Equal work is equally dangerous! 92.3% of all workplace deaths are MEN! If women did work equal to men, they would be injured, disabled, maimed and killed at work in equal numbers, but they don't and thus they are just haters or morons who claim the pay disparity is oppression
I think you missed his point entirely. He's right "If men lived balanced lives, then the general standard of living would be way down". This is very true. The way the economy keeps growing is by teaching men to chase pyssy, and teaching men they need to buy pyssy to get her. Then wast money on alimony. Therefore men spend all their time working themselves to death, making the country richer, and economy stronger. If men only worked how much they need, the standard of living would go down.
perhaps i was wrong, in the western world (mainly america and europe) its vast majority how i described (with some exceptions like jamaica) in the east its vast majority how you just described (with the cities being how i described and the 'country' areas being how you described) cause the simple fact is people in the country are healthier and live longer than people in the city and this has been proven all over the world with different countries
I'm at the bottom end of that upper 5% and to be fair, I'm sort of seeing your point. Then I'm reminded of my frequent overseas buying trips to China / Indonesia / Vietnam were I find the poorest (yet most balanced) people on the planet. I think its perspective, were probably both from entirely different backgrounds and see things totally different.
Excellent video Karl!
i dont need to speak for myself, basic logic and real world facts speak for everyone including you weather you like it or not. the average person (95% of the world population of men) cant have a balanced life only the 5% (the basic rich right up to the elites) can cause they have the power and more importantly the money to be able to work less (if at all) and focus more on other aspect of there life instead of being preoccupied with survival 24/7 ps thats the truth weather u believe it or not
Then its solved - you can't live a balanced life. Speak for yourself brother.
you might want to take a look at the writing above that quote before you start bitching about 'evidence says...' that being this 'the reason men cant lead balanced lives cause they are obligated to provide no matter how long they have to work, hard they have to work, etc' thats the reason we cant live 'balanced lives' the money to boost standard of living comes from us being unbalanced (WORK WORK WORK and little if anything else) and logic and life says im right
Lets simplify: When comparing same jobs for men & women - government statistics show less than 1% pay difference.
"if men where 'intelligent enough to lead balanced lives' then the general standard of living would be WAY DOWN" - Evidence says you're wrong. Single mother homes breed 90% of our inmates; children from single father homes turn out as good as those from stable 2 parent homes.
Oh it continues on big time. Womens groups are in Business to sell panic stories for next years funding. They lobby for tougher laws & expanded legal definitions to create more conflict. Why? So they can sell their bullshit story for more funding. (Eg, rape is now classed as fully clothed innapropriate touching; Domestic violence is now non-physical stomping ones foot on the ground & shouting.) Its all about money & dividing us while the elites assrape our money & future labor.
And even then it may still require additonal work. Because consider the fact that more men are working in a particular feild then that pool will automatically be larger than the other pool. So mathematcians would have to use some kind of relative adjuster, you could not compare absolute pool value in this case.
If what you said is true then that is an in accurate method of comparing wages. You can't pool all men's money and all woman's money then declare a difference. You have to compare job to job. So make seperate pools for every different job in the world then compare pools of the same job. Because since different jobs pay different monies if a man working as CEO is compared to a woman working as cashier thats not accurate and vice versa. Multiple pools must be done to make it accurate.
It is elaborated - 78.5 cents earned per 1 dollar a man earns comparing the entire job pool of women (starting at 35 hours a week) to men (working 60 hours a week.) The entire concept of wage gap is a scam / comparing apples to oranges. Discriminating ANYONE by paying less for the same work has been illegal for decades.
7:36 dont like that last part. whats he trying to say men arnt intelligent the reason men cant lead balanced lives cause they are obligated to provide no matter how long they have to work, hard they have to work, etc. if men where 'intelligent enough to lead balanced lives' then the general standard of living would be WAY DOWN